State officials hope that a
new law in effect Friday, requiring all servers
and bartenders to receive specialized alcohol
training within 90 days of being hired, could
help with the ambiguity.
Senate Enrolled Act 382 --
authored by Sen. Ron Alting, R-Lafayette -- will
impact about 10,000 retail establishments and
100,000 employees in the state, according to
Alting. All must be certified under the training
regimen by January 2008.
According to the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, such
programs can reduce nighttime drunken driving
crashes by 17 percent and save crash costs per
licensed driver by $200.
Alcohol-related crashes cost
Indiana citizens $2.4 billion in 1998.
The training sessions will
school servers on Indiana's alcohol laws, the
effects of alcohol on human behavior,
recognizing fake identification and other
alcohol-related issues.
"Personally, I think it's a
really great idea. As of right now, if you're
21, all you have to do is send in a paper to get
your license," New, 22, said. "The only training
you get is a "yes/no" question. Then you file it
away and you forget about it."
Supporters also say the
legislation, dubbed Responsible Alcohol Server
Training, can save lives. It hits a personal
note for Dan Towery, a founder and volunteer for
the West Central Indiana Chapter of Mothers
Against Drunk Driving.
His daughter, Sarah, 24, and
her boyfriend, Chip Smith, 20, were killed on
March 21, 1999, when a drunken driver crossed
the center line on County Road 350 South,
causing a head-on crash that killed all three
involved.
"We're not looking for this to
be any type of silver bullet, but it's one of
the pieces that is needed," said Towery, of West
Lafayette. "These people are selling
mind-altering drugs that when consumed in large
quantities can lead all the way to alcohol
poisoning, to not being able to control a
vehicle."
Lafayette police Chief Don
Roush favors the legislation and called it a
"community policing concept" that allows the
average citizen to help keep drunken drivers off
the roadways.
"In the end, it can possibly
save lives," he said.
The driver of the crash that
killed Towery's daughter, 39-year-old Jeffrey P.
Trout, had a blood-alcohol content of 0.27
percent at the time of his death. The bartender
who served 10 drinks in 2 1/2 hours to Trout was
later convicted of criminal recklessness and
sentenced to 180 days in jail.
In Indiana, it is a criminal
offense to sell or furnish alcoholic beverages
to an intoxicated person.
"The responsibility is still
with the person who is consuming -- but the
person doing the serving has to have some
responsibility also," Towery said. "I do blame
the bartender who basically overserved Jeff
Trout."
The NHTSA reports that,
nationwide, 40 percent to 60 percent of
intoxicated patrons drive after consuming
alcohol in bars, clubs or restaurants. In 2002,
269 people were killed in alcohol-related
crashes, data show.
"A program such as this one
has been established in over 20 other states,"
Alting said in a statement. "These programs have
proven to decrease sales to intoxicated people."
Training procedures and
recertification processes will be established by
the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission.
Under the new law, a license
must be renewed every two years and before
receiving it, a server or bartender must pass a
test. Currently, anyone 19 or 20 years old who
wants to serve alcohol or anyone supervising a
19- or 20-year-old server must receive a similar
license and training.
"It's good also for the
business and the person who's serving," New
said. "If a person I serve gets in accident --
or worse, kills someone -- drunk driving,
legally I can get in trouble."
Erika Hurd, 25, has worked as
a bartender and server at various Lafayette-area
restaurants, including the 8 West martini bar,
Sarge Oak restaurant and Chilis Bar and Grill.
Though she says she
understands the legislation's merit, she
questions it's effectiveness -- especially in a
college town.
"Server turnaround is
typically so high that once a business pays for
a server to go through training, it's almost not
worth it," Hurd said. "In the long run, they're
going to lose money."
Still, says Hurd: "It couldn't
hurt, especially if managers are trained in what
to do, too. A lot of times, when you have a
feeling about a customer, the manager is
involved in the decision to cut that person
off."